in defense of a point and shoot

g10_jeffco_small_wp

Jefferson County High School Firstcoming 2009, photographed with the Canon G10, copyright Erik M. Lunsford

A good friend of mine once told the story about a newspaper staff photojournalist who uses (or used, considering the age of the story) a pair of point and shoot cameras on assignment for that photographer’s paper. Startling, I remember, since at the time I was a rookie photographer lovingly enjoying the sight of two large cameras dangling from my neck and couldn’t fully comprehend the reason behind this perceived insanity. I remembered Alex Majoli’s point and shoot stories in Iraq and it hit me — the benefits of these little cameras sometimes outweigh the gross limitations, yielding some very unique and powerful imagery that has its own style footprint and usefulness. Unfortunately I brushed all that inspiration off and moved on, shooting years worth of portfolio material with my digital SLRs that changed only with the paper I was affiliated with. Nikons in Florida, Canons in Missouri.

Fast forward a few years. I’m editing my portfolio with the help of Sid Hastings, and in some sort of bizarre karmaic twist my jaw drops. Our portfolio edit stuns me, because for the first time in my career my portfolio is led with a photograph made on a point and shoot camera. And, I’m not ashamed of that…in fact I’m delighted. Would you like to see? Here, let me help you with the link. It’s the photograph of the St. Louis Cardinals players at spring training.

Here’s how it started. I was filming the players with my High Def camera for some b-roll. I had been waiting three weeks for the players to use this fantastic white wall stuck in the middle of fields. I wanted some stills of it and wasn’t willing to compromise with a video frame grab. So I grabbed the Canon G10 that I carried with me for quick video work, set it to aperture priority with a stop and a quarter under to bring out the colors, and framed the photograph. Prefocusing on the white wall (not hard with the contrast) and using the optical viewfinder, I captured about twenty silent frames while the HD camera continued to roll under me. Since the G10’s shutter is silent, my audio was unaffected.

Fantastic, I thought!

The depth of field with the tiny sensor chip actually helped me by bringing the bat and ball and background players into focus. In addition, nobody knew I was capturing pictures. They’re used to the chattering sound of SLR cameras, not the submarine-silent quality of the point and shoot. Fantastic, fantastic!

Since then, the G10 and I have had a rocky relationship. Editors would pass it back to me for the early morning spot-news shift, and I would have to relearn its quirks. Other staffers would change settings and before I knew it the camera was chirping at me, firing off the AF-assist light at the most inappropriate times, and singing to me with clumsy start up sounds. Now that I have it back for a period of time, I’ve reset the custom functions to what I consider relatively fast for quick operation. It works like this:

Set the camera to manual or aperture priority with continuous AF and capture. Set the focus to the center sensor and underexpose a stop or two using JPG capture.

Prefocus.

Prefocus.

Prefocus.

Use the AF-Assist light only when necessary, and always turn the flash off. When flash is needed, set it to minimum output and only use it within a foot or two of the subject.

With those settings dialed in, I’m finding more uses for this little camera. It gets me into some tough access situations, because it doesn’t scream big camera. It’s silent, which is key. And, it also focuses quickly in the dark, a trait that my SLRs stumble on.

Here’s the kicker. It isn’t a fix-all. There are still shortcomings. It’s slow, it’s got a sensor jammed with way too many pixels and too much noise (which apparently might be relieved with the new G11 successor), and the optical viewfinder takes me back like a hundred years. Yet, it continues to amaze me.

Here’s where Alex Majoli comes in again. Walking around with the G10 sans my SLRs makes me feel a little, oh how should I say it, naked? What if that prized photo pops right up out of the ground and I don’t have the Mark II & 24-70 ready? That’s where you have to swallow hard, prep the compact camera, and go to work. You might be amazed what these little cameras can do for you. Push the limitations of the camera’s benefits, and use it for specific purposes. Take the photo above as an example. I was shooting a high school dance in a pitch black room. The Mark II was straining to see in the dark. The little G10 zeroed in the focus, and I captured such unexpected frames that surprised me. Above, with the G10 set at F2.8 @ 1/8 th of a second, I caught the flash from a nearby camera, highlighting the girls on the left. Combined with fantastic depth of field (it’s like seeing clear in the dark), the frame pops off the canvas.

Now, if Alex can shoot prize-winning mag work using his setup of point n’ shoots, then I can down that silly thought of feeling like a tourist and make pictures that a SLR couldn’t get. Now, don’t ditch the SLRs by any means — that would be foolish. Daily work belongs mainly to rugged staff kits, but more and more there’s a place in my heart for these little compact cameras.

Comments 8

  1. max bittle wrote:

    ha! it’s so ironic that you posted this entry, i was literally about to send you an email requesting a print trade for that cards picture. not only do i love the snap, but am a huge cards fan. it’s a win win for my wall. :)

    enjoyed the post erik.

    Posted 12 Oct 2009 at 9:58 pm
  2. erik wrote:

    Thanks Max & Trent. Max, just hit me up offline to get some address info from you.

    Posted 12 Oct 2009 at 10:42 pm
  3. Mark Dodge Medlin wrote:

    It’s always nice to see pros defending point-and-shot cameras, and you’ve given some good advice here about how to get more from them.

    I love my Canon A620 for the reasons you and Alex Majoli note – the silence, the convenient size, the swiveling screen (which besides allowing surreptitious people photos lets me get low and high shots that wouldn’t be possible if I had to look through a viewfinder).

    My wife gave me a Nikon DSLR for my birthday last month. It’s my number-one camera, and it definitely takes better photos. It also has a swiveling screen, which was a must, even though it turns out I don’t use the live view that much. But its noise and size mean I’ll always have a place for my little Canon. I can just put it in my pocket and go. Fantastic.

    Posted 13 Oct 2009 at 2:25 pm
  4. Parker MB wrote:

    I had a good time with the G10’s I’ve known as well, amazingly crisp in surprising situations. I’ve also been impressed by the little Panasonic/Leica point-and-shoots. Now if only they didn’t look so ridiculous on top of a huge tripod…

    Posted 13 Oct 2009 at 5:10 pm
  5. erik wrote:

    All great points. Mark — you’re absolutely right, there are shots you can grab with that swiveling screen that you couldn’t with the DSLR. Parker MB — the Panasonic Lumix cameras are stellar. The addition of HD video and shooting format options make it a standout.

    Posted 13 Oct 2009 at 8:33 pm
  6. Sid wrote:

    Erik, nice post. I didn’t realize that was a G10 image. It is another tool.

    You seen the new Olympus PEN cameras? They seem pretty interesting, somewhere between a G10 and an analog rangefinder:

    http://www.robertsimaging.com/stock/Interchangeable%20Lens%20Compacts%20(EVILs)/Olympus/E-P1%20(Silver%20-%20Black)%20(with%2017mm%20and%20OVF)%20(262817).jsp

    I had a chance to play with one a little at MPW, and it looks promising. It would be great to hear from someone putting it through a real-life test about how the files look and what the resolution is like in a low light situation.

    And I don’t know a lot about the Lumix series, but it, too, seems promising.

    Posted 15 Oct 2009 at 4:22 pm
  7. Nir Alon wrote:

    Exactly one year ago I was putting together a blog post contemplating on equipment versus content and composition (http://tinyurl.com/cl7kle). Funny, but most of my favorite images were NOT made with an SLR (examples in the post).

    Posted 03 Dec 2009 at 1:36 am
  8. Ari wrote:

    Nice article. My good friend Steven Day shot Flight 1549 with his G9 and look at that! The best camera is the one that you have on hand. Just sold my Mark IIN for a G11. Saving my back for my kids.

    Posted 25 Feb 2010 at 12:46 am

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 1

  1. From in defense of a point and shoot | uncommons | The Click on 12 Oct 2009 at 9:47 pm

    [...] in defense of a point and shoot | uncommons: I’m editing my portfolio with the help of Sid Hastings, and in some sort of bizarre karmaic [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *